Фазовая диаграмма системы Hg-In

К оглавлению: Другие диаграммы (Others phase diargams)

Hg-In

Hg-In (Mercury-Indium) H. Okamoto The assessed Hg-In phase diagram is essentially the same as in [Metals], except for minor modifications in temperatures and compositions of invariant reactions. The assessed diagram was based primarily on [64Mor], [66Cla], and [ 70Hel], with review of the data of [51Ito], [53Spi], [61Koz], [62Chi], [62Egg], [62Jan], [63Col], [69Koz], [70Koz], and [70Mas]. However, significant inconsistency was found in the identification and stoichiometries of intermediate phases and their homogeneity ranges. The maximum melting temperature of (Hg) is -15 C, occurring at about 14.3 at. % In, where Hg6In was previously believed to melt. Reports on the temperature dependence of the solubility of Hg in (In) are contradictory. According to [54Tyz], an (In) alloy with 6.45 at.% Hg quenched from 94 C was fct, which transformed to fcc after 1 month at room temperature. [63Col] observed that a 7 at.% Hg alloy quenched from 85 C was cubic, transforming to two-phase cubic + fct after holding at room temperature for 6 weeks. At about -78 C, it was wholly tetragonal, presumably having transformed martensitically. The assessed value is based on [63Col]. However, redetermination of the fcc = fct transition boundaries is needed because of the conflicting reports. [63Mer] measured the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) of Hg-In phases for the entire composition range. All phases become superconducting with Tc higher than 3 K. e shows the highest Tc (4.5 K) at the Hg-richest end of the homogeneity range (~80 at.% In). Tc for each phase decreases rapidly with increasing In content in the homogeneity range of each. Tc of (In) shows a minimum at 1.75 at .% Hg [60Ree], which is 3.4 K [ 63Mer]. 51Ito: H. Ito, E. Ogawa, and T. Yanagase, J. Jpn. Inst. Met., B15, 382-384 ( 1951) in Japanese. 53Spi: W.M. Spicer and C.J. Banick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 75, 2268-2269 (1953). 54Tyz: C. Tyzack and G.V. Raynor, Trans. Faraday Soc., 50, 675-684 (1954). 60Ree: M.D. Reeber, Phys. Rev., 117, 1476-1482 (1960). 61Koz: L.F. Kozin and N.N. Tananaeva, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 6(4), 909-912 (1961) in Russian; TR: Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 6(4), 463-465 (1961). 62Chi: R.V. Chiarenzelli and O.L.I. Brown, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 7(4), 477-478 ( 1962). 62Egg: G.L. Eggert, Trans. ASM, 55, 891-897 (1962). 62Jan: G. Jangg, Z. Metallkd., 53, 612-614 (1962). 63Col: B.R. Coles, M.F. Merriam, and Z. Fisk, J. Less-Common Met., 5, 41-48 ( 1963). 63Mer: M.F. Merriam, M.A. Jensen, and B.R. Coles, Phys. Rev., 130(5), 1719- 1726 (1963). 64Mor: W. Morawietz, Chem. Eng. Tech., 36(6), 638-647 (1964) in German. 66Cla: T. Claeson and M.F. Merriam, J. Less-Common Met., 11, 186-190 (1966). 69Koz: L.F. Kozin and M.B. Dergacheva, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 43(1), 249-250 (1969) in Russian; TR: Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 43(1), 134-135 (1969). 70Hel: M.W. Heller and L.E. Musgrave, J. Less-Common Met., 20(2), 77-82 (1970). 70Koz: L.F. Kozin and V.A. Sudakov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Met., (5), 197-201 ( 1970) in Russian; TR: Russ. Metall., (5), 145-148 (1970). 70Mas: Y.P. Mascarenhas, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 3(5), 294-296 (1970). 72Seg: M. Segnini and B.C. Giessen, Acta Crystallogr. B, 28(1), 320-321 (1972). 79Mah: T.X. Mahy and B.C. Giessen, J. Less-Common Met., 63(2), 257-264 (1979). Submitted to the APD Program. Complete evaluation contains 2 figures, 5 tables, and 48 references. Special Points of the Hg-In System